CAMSHAFTS -- WHAT? HOW? WHY?
By George Riehl
Reprinted from the
1979 Issue of the Chrysler 300 Club News Volume V Number III
It is the writer’s
goal to show various differences of hemi engine versus hemi engine
and wedge to wedge as far as performance is affected.
The 1955, 1956 and 1957
engines share the same camshafts, but then the 1957 uses a larger
2.00 intake valve versus the previous 1.94 valve. Without further
discussion, the 1957 300C engine performs better. Raw cubic inch
factor is also involved.
One exception exists
with the 1956 300B engine. That is the 355 horsepower version. That
was accomplished with an optional head that increased compression to
10.0 to 1 and torque was raised from 385 lbs. to 405 lbs.
The 1957 390 HP engine
used a different camshaft than all others. There seems to be more
than one variation of this engine camshaft ranging from the solid
lifter type to an Iskendarian roller cam assembly. Then there is
another unknown cam that is currently being degreed and checked on
specifications. The variety of cams for 1957 was a result of
Chrysler’s racing program.
Then in 1958, the hemi
was offered with an electronic fuel injection unit that was of Bendix
design. The standard 392 300 engine and the F. I. engine shared the
same camshaft. The use of fuel injection would result in higher
horsepower, 10 to be exact, with all other factors the same as the
380 HP engine except for exhaust manifold size.
In 1959 the 413 wedge
appeared, and whether anyone wants to dispute it or not, with less
performance than the previous 2 years of 300s. The camshaft design
was changed greatly which resulted in engine deficiency. The table
quite clearly shows the reason. Plus it (the engine) was not a well
tested performance engine. This was due to less expensive block and
head casting versus the higher cost hemi engine. Chrysler HAD to
economize!
The 1960 and 1961
engines showed much more promise with the ram tuned engine. Much
experimenting went into these engines and they seem to be the most
unique in the world of automotive history. Rams actually do ram in
fuel/air mixture to the cylinders and result in progressive
compression ratio changes only in the fact of putting in more cubic
inches of fuel/air mix into the cylinders than they were normally
designed for. Not only that, but the runners on the tubes leading
from the carbs to the heads of the intake valves created a pulsing
action that would sonically and physically push the air into the
combustion chambers. This also helped to “blow” out some
of the burnt gases from the combustion chamber into the exhaust
system.
The optional cam for
the 1960 and 1961 413-400 HP engine was of different technical design
because they used not hydraulic lifters, but used solid lifters with
adjustable rockers. Hydraulic and solid lifter camshafts cannot be
exchanged between their components. The grinding of the cam profile
is quite different. The 400 HP cam is more radical than the standard
cam by the then standards.
The 1962 413-380 HP
engine went to solid lifter camshaft and was of better design than
the 1959 version. But then again, the 1959 engine used a hydraulic
camshaft. Also the 1962 engine used a smaller exhaust valve that
reduced its efficiency slightly.
The 1963 and 1964 ram
engine used the ram tubes of slightly different design. The inside
partitions were made shorter than the 1960 and 1961 engines and the
camshaft was again modified to “match” the ram tubes.
These camshafts used solid lifters. Larger exhaust valves and “short”
tubes teamed with camshaft design, resulted in one of, if not the
best, the best performing 300 engines by far.
For the non-ram 1964
and 1965 413-360 HP engines, again the camshaft design was changed to
match the single 4 bbl carb. This cam was also hydraulic and was a
result of proven performance on the street with the 361, 383, and 426
wedge high-performance engines. This camshaft (design or grind) has
powered many a Chrysler product engine from about 1959.
I have researched some
“hot rod” of higher performance after market camshafts
that may be used as a replacement for a worn out or broken camshaft
for your 413 wedge engines. Remember that these cams were designed
for higher compression and larger valved engines that were not of the
ram manifold design. Technical involvements arise when going to a
“bigger stick” in your engine and may cause other
problems like valve to piston interference and too great a
progressive compression ratio increase. Example – one might use
the Crower 32914 cam in the 1959, 1960, 1961 standard 300 engine and
also in the 1964, 1965 360 HP engines.
One side effect of this
replacement cam would be a complete change of valve springs, spring
height specification changes and, of course, a reduction in miles per
gallon used. Also, all lifters would have to be new.
This chart is to be
used for your reference only and the club does not authorize any
non-stock camshaft for your use. But, in some cases, what else would
one do if a camshaft was needed badly to get a 300 on the road? Our
Technical Director, Gil Cunningham, is continually trying to locate
the original manufacturers of the original camshafts and will keep us
all posted. He has to date, located the original grinder of the 1963
and 1964 ram 390 HP engines. He is also following a lead on the 1957
(1955?, 1956?) cam manufacturer and will advise us as soon as it is
verified.
Until original
manufacturers are located and established that they still have the
master cams, the option exists for the restorer to purchase a
camshaft of recent manufacture that comes closest to the original 300
cam. But with the possibility of premium gasoline not being available
in the very near future, the situation would exist that with the
“performance” cams an engine on regular gas would start
blowing holes in pistons, breaking rings, pounding out valves and
valve seats and even to the point of damaging engine bearings.
The 300 engine may be a
“brute” but it does have its limits, and if you want it
to live a long and satisfying life, treat it as you would anything
else of value. Treat it like a lady. Nothing is as pleasing as a good
sound and pleasurable feelings. It is truly a love affair between man
and his machines.
CAMSHAFT
SPECIFICATIONS FOR 300 ENGINES
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963-64
1964-65
Std
Opt
Std
F I
Hyd
Solid
Hyd
Solid
Ram
Non-Ram
35
35
35
20
32
32
20
20
25
20
25
22
18
24
65
65
65
55
64
64
60
68
79
68
79
66
70
64
280
280
280
255
276
276
260
268
284
268
284
268
268
268
65
65
65
60
73
73
58
60
74
60
74
62
66
64
25
25
25
20
23
23
22
28
30
28
30
26
22
24
270
270
270
260
276
276
260
268
284
268
284
268
268
268
60
60
60
40
55
55
42
48
55
48
55
48
40
48
.444
.444
.444
.455
.435
.435
.390
.430
.449
.430
.449
.444
.445
.430
.435
.435
.435
.455
.442
.442
.390
.430
.454
.430
.454
.456
.452
.430
1.94
1.94
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.08
2.08
2.08
2.08
2.08
2.08
2.08
2.08
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.75
1.74
1.60
1.74
1.60
1.74
1.60
1.74
1.60
AFTERMARKET
CAMS
HYDRAULIC
LIFTER
(413-426-440)
SOLID
LIFTER
(331-354-392)
Crower
Crower
Ramchargers
TRW
MoPar
Crane
Zimmer
Crane
32100
32914
2910
TP140
P3690214
HT-284-2-NC
M-282-8-C
34
18
32
TDC*
36
31
32
38
66
66
68
38*
68
73
64
64
280
264
280
288
284
284
276
282
74
66
68
44*
72
80
73
74
26
18
32
6*
32
34
23
28
280
264
280
288
284
294
276
282
60
36
64
64
68
65
55
66
.460
.450
.439
.444
.471
.430
.405
.443
.460
.450
.439
.445
.474
.448
.4125
.443
Jean-Yves Chouinard writes in 2016:
Jamie Hyde writes in 2021:
|